We provide the verifiable Human-in-the-Loop infrastructure to ensure AI models meet expert-reviewed quality standards before clinical deployment.
Models deployed without sufficient expert review create a dangerous gap between technical capabilities and clinical safety requirements.
Unvalidated AI models can provide clinically inappropriate guidance.
Incorrect AI outputs risk patient safety and treatment outcomes.
Organizations face liability without proper AI validation frameworks.
Clinicians and patients lose confidence in AI-driven healthcare.
We have combined rigorous HITL testing with a global clinician network to build the adjudication layer for the next generation of healthcare AI.
7,500+ clinicians contributing to AI evaluation
Human-in-the-loop evaluation for medical AI
Our Human-in-the-Loop system captures the reasoning of top medical experts, creating the ground-truth data needed to train the automated AI judges of tomorrow.
Our foundation isn’t just code. For years, iCliniq has been a global ecosystem of care, serving over 8 million patients.
We applied the same rigorous accountability from our clinical operations to our internal AI tools. We realized that traditional evaluation methods failed to capture the unique interdependence of accuracy, safety, and empathy required in medicine.
Measure whether your model is clinically useful-not just correct.
Modern LLMs may provide technically correct answers but still lack actionability, clinical nuance, or safe recommendations. Perpendicular AI evaluates clinical utility using both gold-standard benchmarks and physician review, depending on the product.
Ensure your model expresses the right answer in the right way.
Healthcare requires not only correctness but also the preferred style of communication for clinicians, patients, or internal workflows.
Assess reasoning quality-without revealing sensitive internal reasoning to users.
Many healthcare tasks depend on structured reasoning: differential diagnosis, treatment justification, rule-out logic, and stepwise problem solving.
Evaluate citation correctness + evidence grounded-ness.
In healthcare, unsupported claims pose real risk. Perpendicular AI evaluates whether outputs are factually linked to reputable evidence sources and whether citations are: Correct, Relevant, Non-hallucinated, Consistent with the clinical answer
Evaluate multimodal model reasoning with radiology, pathology, dermatology, and other clinical images.
As models expand into image modalities, evaluation must measure diagnostic quality, finding recognition, and risk detection.
Evaluate the full RAG pipeline-retrieval quality, grounding, and final answer accuracy.
For healthcare, the retrieval component can make or break safety. We provide RAG-specific evaluation metrics to assess how well sources are fetched, grounded, and cited.
We transform AI evaluation from a single metric to a comprehensive assessment of clinical viability using a proprietary framework.
High-fidelity workflows drawn from millions of consultations.
Integrating automated metrics (BERT, ICC) with HITL judgment.
Continuous oversight by Medical Review Board.
Dedicated bias checks aligned with HIPAA/GDPR.
Get a tailored enterprise quote built to match your model’s needs, evaluation depth, and delivery timelines.
Every clinician undergoes identity and credential verification, with licenses checked against national medical boards.
Most evaluations are completed within 5-7 business days, depending on volume and complexity.
Yes, all data is encrypted in transit and at rest. We comply with HIPAA and GDPR for data handling.